It seemed extravagant to fly to Boston
from Los Angeles just to see a play, but in the end I couldn't resist.
Early in February of 2013 I had received an email from my friend Jonathan Beckwith, a distinguished microbiologist and geneticist at Harvard Medical School, telling me about a new project he had organized. Jon had recently participated in a collaboration at the Free University of Berlin with science students and members of the English Theater Berlin. They had all read Caryl Churchill's play, A Number, on the subject of human cloning, and discussed the social issues it raised. Excited by this experience, Jon decided to try something similar with his students at Harvard. But instead of having them discuss existing plays, he and a former student, Ben Morris, recruited Sightline theater director Calla Videt to work with students in his "Social Issues in Biology" class to create a new theater piece altogether.
Early in February of 2013 I had received an email from my friend Jonathan Beckwith, a distinguished microbiologist and geneticist at Harvard Medical School, telling me about a new project he had organized. Jon had recently participated in a collaboration at the Free University of Berlin with science students and members of the English Theater Berlin. They had all read Caryl Churchill's play, A Number, on the subject of human cloning, and discussed the social issues it raised. Excited by this experience, Jon decided to try something similar with his students at Harvard. But instead of having them discuss existing plays, he and a former student, Ben Morris, recruited Sightline theater director Calla Videt to work with students in his "Social Issues in Biology" class to create a new theater piece altogether.
Their collaboration produced Edge of the Map, a collage based on real-life and invented scenarios involving ethical and social dilemmas in genetics. One of the texts for the "Social Issues" class was Mapping Fate, an autobiographical book of mine about Huntington's disease experience and research. [1] One of the real-life narratives in the theater piece involved a character named Alice, based on the book, who learns she is at 50% risk for this disease.
It was certainly flattering to learn
that I was going to be a character in a play! But even more intriguing was the
opportunity to see how experimental theater might engage with difficult ethical
and social dilemmas emerging out of the new molecular genetics—dilemmas posed
by the increasing number of predictive genetic tests, by new technologies for
manipulating genes, and by the commercial possibilities of genetics research. As
a long-time lover of theater as well as an influential science activist (he was
one of the founders of Science for the People in the 1970s), Jon was excited by
the opportunity to explore new ways of communicating scientific knowledge and of
investigating the social dimensions of science. He also thought that the process of creating a theatrical
performance could open up new ways of thinking about science. Calla Videt too
had thought deeply about these issues. As a Harvard undergrad with a major in
theater and physics, she had created a highly successful theater piece, The Space Between, about theoretical physicist and Nobel Laureate
Richard Feynman. Her New York theater company Sightline was specifically
interested in exploring scientific questions. Calla and other members of Sightline tossed
ideas back and forth with the science students, who sat in on rehearsals with
the student actors and created materials and visuals for the piece. Everyone wished they had more time.
Genetics was not Calla's field, but she
learned fast and the students in Beckwith's class helped focus the major
questions for the piece—how much do we want to know about our genetic
identities? How much of our biology can we or should we try to control? What do
we wish to pass on to our children and what do we think our genes say about who
we are? Can theater create new ways of learning and communicating about
science? Can science help create new forms of theater?
|
On
Saturday evening, April 13, at the first performance I attended (I went
twice!), I joined other attendees seated in rolling chairs lining the corridor
outside a converted classroom/physics lab/performance space in the Harvard
Science Building. Roaming actors blindfolded us. After a while they rolled us
into the large concrete space where we were bombarded with genetic and
genealogical data from young voices that seemed to be dancing around us. Suddenly
we were told to remove our blindfolds, as if we were about to make our own
discoveries. A somewhat frantic young scientist in front of a whiteboard was
explaining the basics of DNA while other actors moved among video projections
and changing scrims. Stories unfolded in fragments—a young woman is
institutionalized and, on a table surrounded by a screen, sterilized against
her will, a sequence based on the historical case of Leilani Muir, who sued the
Canadian province of Alberta for forcibly sterilizing her in 1959. A stressed-out young couple try to create a "perfect" baby, producing instead a
whining monster. A young man on a TV talk show broadcasts that his sperm is
genetically "perfect" and finds himself besieged with seductive phone
calls from women seeking a donation. The young scientist we encountered at the
start discovers to his horror that his sperm sample has been mislabeled and
lost. And then there is Alice, who learns her mother suffers from Huntington's
disease and is confronted with her own 50-50 risk. Her father Milton takes her on a
road trip across the country while they consider what to do.
Mariel Pettee as Leilani Muir in Edge of the Map, 2013. Photo by Chris Masterson, courtesy Sightline. |
All of these narratives unfold in pieces, interrupting each other across different parts of the space, blending dialogue, dance, physical movement, video and slide projections, sounds, music, and changing lights. Playing out over the course of an hour, the piece disturbs and exhilarates, engaging all the senses at once. At the close the actors walk around and address audience members individually, intoning "your child will inherit your grandmother's blue eyes," "your offspring will possess your uncle's musical talent," "you have inherited your father's weak heart." But they deliver their lines with a sense of irony, knowing that such straightforward predictions are precisely the problem they wish to engage.
What then did we come away with? Certainly the piece focused on the ways that genetics has been exploited for negative social purposes, such as the forcible eugenic sterilization of women deemed inferior and the promotion of stigmatizing notions of biological perfection and control. For this reason, perhaps, my scientist friends were somewhat critical, although they enjoyed the experience. One wanted the piece to include a story about the medical benefit of a genetic discovery. Another found the fragmented form confusing, the moving chairs distracting and dizzying. A third, a medical student, worried that the piece could have drawn on more recent discoveries.
And yet, for me the multiple dimensions in which the piece unfolded brilliantly evoked the interconnectedness of our biological and social natures and the complexity of our so-called "genes." It beautifully satirized the ways in which our consumerist culture of competitive acquisitiveness and desires for control extended even to our genomes. The sterilization story was devastating (an indication of the historical time frame would have been helpful), conveying the anguish of Muir through the stark beauty and restraint of Mariel Pettee, an accomplished dancer as well as actor. The Alice sequences were also haunting, with Anna Hagen as Alice and Eli Pelton Wilson as her father projecting a sense of ambivalence and uncertainty—feelings I had tried to describe in Mapping Fate—as Alice learns of her 50-50 risk for Huntington's and considers the potential consequences of getting more precise genetic information through testing.
I came away from the Sunday evening performance of Edge of the Map with a sense of exhilaration that was tempered only by the tragedy of the following day, the day when two young men launched deadly explosives in the midst of the Boston Marathon. At least no one was talking about their genes.
—Alice
Wexler
Wexler is a
CSW Research Scholar. She received a Ph.D. in History from the Indiana
University in 1972 after completing a dissertation entitled “Historians,
Society, and the Spanish-Cuban-American War of 1898.” She has taught at UC
Riverside, California Institute of Technology, Claremont Graduate School,
Occidental College and UCLA. Her books include Emma
Goldman in America (1984), Emma Goldman in Exile (1989), Mapping Fate: A Memoir of Family, Risk, and
Genetic Research (1996), and The Woman Who Walked Into the Sea:
Huntington’s the Making of a Genetic Disease (2008).
[1] Huntington's
disease is a fatal genetic, neurological and psychiatric illness emerging
typically in mid-life and causing involuntary movements (chorea), emotional
disturbances such as depression, irritability, and apathy, and cognitive
decline often leading to dementia.
No comments:
Post a Comment